If we follow a course from a guided path and complete the course, it doesn't return to the guided path page. There's a link to 'View more courses' which means I have to go back to 'Guided Path' then find the path path I'm following...
It would be great to have links back to the path you're on or just the paths that the course is part of so we don't have to find it again.
I suggest to make avaliable an option to filter using a 'except'/'not' clause, on Service Center logs.
As today it is, we can filter most logs in Service Center by a lot of options, making it easy to track an app/espace/message while searching for something specific...
On the other hand, when you are doing the oposite, like looking through all messagens in search for something amiss or out of place, having the same app/espace appearing over and over again, makes things a lot more challenging... specially when you need to pass through pages of the same content...
We have this cool spaceship icon that takes us to the top of the page in the community forums
It would be nice to have a similar (opposite) icon that takes us to the bottom of the page on very long posts/discussion. Perhaps an anvil or submarine icon?
When we share an application in the forge made with our personal environment, the "created by" property of the pages, actions, etc keeps our personal email. Since I value privacy, this has prevented me of sharing applications in the past.
I suggest that, when sharing an application in the forge, the email gets replaced by the user name.
I know there is an inline edit widget in the forum, but I would like an intelliwarp editable grid standard built in in AgilePlatform, with images for save, delete, edit in the left column. Proper edit widgets acoording to the type of te field (input, combobox, textarea, etc). Would make apps great and development much easier.
Hello,
A lot of OutSystems customers get confused regarding our Teams being Application Teams instead of User teams, and one scenario that they get confused with is that when they have multiple businesses/independent teams working inside the same infrastructure, they can't allow the users to create applications only inside their teams.
The use case is that you have multiple independent teams working in your infrastructure, and you want them to be "somewhat" autonomous, but then in Lifetime you only really have 2 options:
So as you can see, as far as I know, there's no real workaround for this use case.
In my opinion, one way of fixing this without creating a new permission layer would be a dropdown inside Service Studio when you are creating an application so that you could choose the "Application Teams" that you have Change & Deploy in and then allowing the users to create applications as long as they have Change & Deploy in at least one team and automatically assign the app to that team. The dropdown could include "No Team" if the user has Change & Deploy as default.
The other option would be a new permission layer for user groups, which would mean being able to group your users (one user to only one team at any time), and then giving them permissions to applications assigned to that team (like the opposite of the Application Teams right now) would fix this issue, since then you could have List as default and change and deploy in your User Group, and all applications that you would create could be automatically assigned to your User Group.
I hope the idea is clear enough, sorry for this wall of text!
Thank you in advance!
When comparing with a production version we usually download the OAP and use it to compare with existing development or quality version.
When doing so, Service Studio keeps loading versions from source control.
This has some impact on the IDE as it gets quite slow.
As we are comparing with a file, there is no need to load all the information.
The suggestion would be to separate "Previous version" and "file" in different tabs.
I don't understand why there is so much effort been put into the interactive hands-on demos in Service Studio. Better create an eLearning module on the internet. We've used the PDF's from the online developer training. and that's ok for a lot of people.
Hi,
when importing entities from multiple excel files each one must be imported separetedly. It would be nice if in the "Import Entities from Excel" window I could select multiple excel files and each one be imported automatically.
It'd be nice to have the Reminders on another tab so they are separate from the Warnings. I've been using these to jump to locations in the code. More like Bookmarks within the code base and I think it'd help larger teams be more explicit about where things are within the systems:
Hey there, i have just thought that those technical talks are some what dry and boring and they are piling up many things without any working example, but with a static photos which i found boring and difficult to comprehend. In my learning experience, i have found learning through hands-on videos with explanation and documenting all technical stuffs with screenshots was the best. Also following documented procedure for lab works is making the learning process difficult.
Thank You
When you use the new search feature, you get the list of the espaces that are using that particular item
Would be awesome to be able to delete unused references directly from there
Hi guys,
i have a few complexed advanced queries that has a lot of inputs and usually i copy/paste the query executed sql to management studio and tweak it from there.
What do you think if the executed sql includes the variable declaration? The purpose of this is that we don't need find and replace all variables and change it only one time on query header.
Here's an example:
From:
SyntaxEditor Code Snippet
SELECT [Fields] FROM [Table] WHERE [Field] = @InputId
To:
declare @InputId int = SELECT [Fields] FROM [Table] WHERE [Field] = @InputId
Kind regards,
Guilherme Jesus
Hi,
Here it goes: after publishing an espace on Service Studio, if a consumer espace gets outdated be able to right-click on the message and request an update of the refered espace.
Regards.
Pedro Ávila
Enable Gzip compression
A list of possible enhancements. I searched in the ideas area to see if these were already there and couldn't find anything. If this should be merged with something else, please do so.
Minor Enhancements
• View sequence – in addition to most recent and most liked, add all the ‘marks’ (see below) which will allow me to see the ideas that are currently being worked on or not worked on.
• Idea numbers – assign numbers that are viewable everywhere the heading is viewable. When there are hundreds or thousands of ideas, many with similar headings, using a number will help identify the correct idea when being discussed.
Enhancements to the 'Status' of an Idea (modeled after information found here - http://www.outsystems.com/forums/discussion/11570/user-stories-for-woc/)
• Marking an idea as “planned implementation”
As a manager a user will be able to add mark an idea as ‘planned implementation’. In doing so, the manager shall set an expected delivery date and release version and add a comment. The expected delivery date and version is visible to collaborators.
• Marking an idea as “implementation in progress”
As a manager a user will be able to add mark an idea as ‘planned implementation’. In doing so, the manager shall set an expected delivery date and release version and add a comment. The expected delivery date and version is visible to collaborators.
• Marking an idea as “tentative implementation”
As a manager a user will be able to add mark an idea as ‘tentative implementation’. In doing so, the manager shall set a tentative delivery date and release version and add a comment. The expected delivery date and version is visible to collaborators.
• Marking an idea as “rescheduled implementation”
As a manager a user will be able to add mark an idea as ‘tentative implementation’. In doing so, the manager shall set an expected delivery date and release version and add a comment. The expected delivery date and version is visible to collaborators.
• Marking an idea as “not planned for implementation”
As a manager a user will be able to add mark an idea as ‘not planned for implementation’. In doing so, the manager shall add a comment indicating why the idea is not planned (no resources, needs research, etc.).
• Marking an idea as “not feasible for implementation”
As a manager a user will be able to add mark an idea as ‘not planned for implementation’. In doing so, the manager shall add a comment indicating why the idea is not feasible (too much effort, viable workaround, etc.).
• Marking an idea as “no longer needed”
As a manager a user will be able to add mark an idea as ‘no longer needed’. In doing so, the manager shall add a comment indicating why the idea is no longer needed. For example, there are many ideas for Outsystems that are changes to Enterprise Manager, a component that no longer exists.
• Marking an idea as “implemented”
As a manager a user will be able to add mark an idea as implemented with a completed date and version number.
Rationale for these improvements
• Provide a roadmap for people – what are the plans going forward – will my favourite idea be implemented soon or do I need to implement that myself. For example, the most voted on idea has been around since May 2010. I have no idea if anyone is working on it or if it’s even possible. How can this be? Whoever manages the ideas should be able to provide users information about every idea and where it is (or isn’t) in the pipeline. So knowing a release timeline and what ideas are at least tentatively planned would be a huge help.
• Work in Progress – currently shows the major release but what happens when it feature misses the target release (there are a few examples out there)? Should be changed to ‘rescheduled implementation’.
I would like to right click on a Entity in a non-production Environment and generate one script with delete in cascade to clear all the records from that entity and avoid the error "The DELETE statement conflicted with the REFERENCE constraint".